Smart has the brains,
but Stupid has the balls

In 2010 Diesel launched their legendary ‘Be stupid’ campaign, with a manifesto that now feels like a prophecy: "The world is full of smart people doing all kinds of smart things. That’s smart. Well, we're with stupid." For Diesel, being different wasn't just a marketing strategy – it was the brand’s essence. They didn't just embrace differentiation; they pursued it. They celebrated it. They had the courage to be stupid.

Fast forward to today. Kirby Ferguson's recent New York Times piece on remix culture paints a striking picture of our current reality: "Everything looks the same, sounds the same, is the same." Why? Because we've replaced courage with data, says Ferguson.

His analysis hits home, because it’s something I’ve been observing for a while now. As we become smarter with each passing year – could we maybe do with a little more stupid? Should we make like Diesel and embrace stupidity to truly make a difference? I think yes. And I call it the Smart/Stupid Paradox.

The Smart/Stupid paradox

Every client I worked with for the past twenty years fell prey to the same pattern. During pitch presentations, we showed our most audacious ideas – the ones that truly tapped into the brand's DNA and challenged the status quo. These were the concepts that won us the pitch. The client's eyes would light up, precisely because we were brave enough to break away from what everybody else was doing.

But then the real work began. Suddenly, the questions changed: “Where's the data that proves this will work?” “Can you show us another brand that has done this successfully?” And just like that, the bold vision that won the pitch got diluted, meeting by meeting, presentation by presentation, until it became another safe, familiar solution. The revolutionary became rational. The brave became bland. And another brand faded into the sea of sameness.

This isn't just frustrating – it's the central paradox of contemporary branding. We win by being different, then succeed by becoming the same. We've become so focused on being ‘smart’ – following trends, optimizing metrics, and seeking validation in data – that we've forgotten the power of calculated risks and bold moves.

If you look at it that way, smart is small and restrictive. It analyzes what was, and projects its findings on what may be. Stupid, on the other hand, sees things for how they could be. Stupid is about imagining what's possible, even if it seems risky or uncertain. Smart recreates the same thing all over again. Stupid is bold enough to envision something new, driven by vision rather than data.

Let's be clear, though: data isn't the enemy of innovation – blind devotion to it is. If data could perfectly predict the future, that would be God Mode. But that's not how breakthroughs happen. Real innovation lives in the space between smart and stupid – between what data tells us may happen and what imagination tells us is possible.

Trapped in the algorithm

My Spotify account is the perfect example. Initially, it was magic. It intelligently used data to help me discover more music in a month than in years before. But now? I'm trapped in an infinite loop of echoes. The algorithm has decided who I am, and breaking free seems impossible. Smart made me predictable. Stupid would have made me explore.

Smart or just safe?

Here's where it gets painfully ironic: we all jump on trend forecasts and ‘future-proof’ strategies, thinking we're ahead of the curve. We're being smart, right? But by the time we've implemented these data-driven trends, they’re already outdated and we've landed exactly where everyone else has – in the middle of the pack. That's not smart. That's just safe. My #protip if you really want to make a difference in the industry? Stop playing it safe and add a little stupid to the mix. Be Smart/Stupid.

As Diesel's manifesto declared: "Smart may have the plans... but stupid has the stories." Today, we're drowning in plans and starving for stories.

The art of Smart/Stupid

Smart/Stupid isn't about choosing between data and intuition –
it's about mastering the balance between the two and allowing them to reinforce each other.

It means:

• Understanding data well enough to know when to move past it
• Using analytics as a guide, not a rulebook
• Having the balls to say "This might sound crazy, but...".
• Knowing that while data can light the path, imagination should lead the way.

The Smart/Stupid Key Principles
How to introduce Smart/Stupid in your organization:

• Break patterns: kill so-called ‘best practices’ and create your own. Any ‘proven approach’ is just everyone else's safe choice. Use data to understand the rules, then break them.
  
  
• Create discomfort: make your data scientists sweat. Set aside 10% of your budget for ideas that challenge their findings. If your innovation efforts don’t make your analytics team uncomfortable, you're probably just doing the safe thing all over again.
  
  
• Practice moonshot thinking: feed your impossible ideas first. Instead of starting with what's realistic, start with what would be amazing. Then, don’t let data tell you whether or not to try it, but let it help you figure out how to get there.
  
  
• Embrace productive chaos: track how many times people say "That's crazy!" in meetings. Measure raised eyebrows. Count shocked silences. If everything you do makes perfect sense, it has probably been done before.
  
  
• Induce controlled collision: put your data analysts and creative wildcards in the same room. Give them the same problem to solve. If there's a Smart/Stupid sweet spot, they'll find it together.
  

The magic lives in the balance.

Take the brands we admire most today. They didn't get there by just being smart or just being stupid. Apple's decision to remove the iPhone’s headphone jack in 2017 is the perfect example. Market data showed overwhelming consumer attachment to wired headphones, and critics called it ‘courage bordering on stupidity.’ Yet Apple knew that their vision for a wireless future required breaking from safe, data-backed conventions. This ‘stupid’ decision not only catalyzed the now-booming wireless audio market but led the entire industry to follow suit – with Samsung, Google, and virtually every major manufacturer eventually removing their headphone jacks too. What was once deemed foolish – stupid, if you will – is now celebrated as visionary leadership.

More recently, Volvo created a four-minute cinematic story about parenthood and safety for their EX90 electric SUV when data said attention spans were too short for long-form content. They chose emotional resonance over quick social media hits, defying the current trends of flashy, bite-sized content.

That's Smart/Stupid in action: understanding the landscape well enough to know exactly which rules to break.

The path forward: Be smart enough to be stupid

The real risk today isn't making mistakes — it's being too smart to make anything interesting at all. While data helps optimize the present, courage helps us create the future. Smart/Stupid requires both.

The real magic happens when we use data to understand the landscape, but let imagination decide where to build. Because in a world where everyone's following the same metrics to the same destination, the most powerful differentiation comes from knowing which data to follow and which to challenge.

Remember what Diesel already knew in 2010: "The fact is that if we didn't have stupid thoughts, we'd have no interesting thoughts at all... Smart had one good idea, and that idea was stupid."

If Apple had blindly followed the data in 2017, we'd still be using phones with physical keyboards. But if they'd ignored user data completely, we might still be struggling with unusable touchscreens. Their success came from balancing market research with the courage to reimagine what a phone could be. 

In the end, it's not about choosing between data and intuition – it's about the balance between the two. Do we want to keep saying 'What the data tells us we should...' or dare to start more conversations with 'This may sound stupid, but...'? I know which one leads to better stories.

“The time has come to be smart enough to be stupid again.”

The brand landscape today looks like a sea of sameness precisely because we've forgotten what Diesel boldly proclaimed years ago. True brand differentiation isn't just about standing out – it's about having the courage to stand for something when the data suggests you should sit down and blend in. Because in a world of smart brands playing it safe, true innovation comes from those willing to be just stupid enough to be unforgettable.

COPYRIGHT © 2024 JO VAN GRINDERBEEK 

BRAND EXPERIENCE ARCHITECT

vangrinderbeek